[RichardM]

@ Azaezel wrote:

https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time "Soon"

Soon as in "way before 2005"?

[Chelaru]

@Azaezel wrote:

https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time "Soon"

Soon as in "way before 2005"?

Oh. So dx11 support in T3d will come when we will have ray trace units in Intel GPU's . )

[JeffR]

We've got it on the dockett for 3.9, probably pretty early in it's development arc.

[Dwarf King]

We've got it on the dockett for 3.9, probably pretty early in it's development arc.

It will make Torque 3D MIT work way better on Win 10 machines

[rlranft]

Hey, we've already got Valve beat - It's Torque 3D 3.8 - they still haven't got Half Life 3...

[Chelaru]

So no DX11 in v3.9 ?

When will the particle refactoring will introduced?

When will the PBR branch will be merged with the main line ?

[Azaezel]

So no DX11 in v3.9 ?

We've got it on the dockett for 3.9, probably pretty early in it's development arc.

Least that's how I read it.

When will the particle refactoring will introduced?
When will the PBR branch will be merged with the main line ?

@ LukasPJ will have to speak for himself on the particle refactor.

For PBR, and speaking strictly for myself, I'm hoping to have all the kinks worked out well enough to make 4.0. (Wouldn't be apropriate for a point-release, since for all that it adds quite a bit, it does take a couple things away and alters folks workflows. May or may not be able to pull out some more extracts to slip in earlier, like that https://github.com/GarageGames/Torque3D/pull/855 that the levelinfo/envVolumes bit augments for fallbacks.)

[Chelaru]

So no DX11 in v3.9 ?

We've got it on the dockett for 3.9, probably pretty early in it's development arc.

Least that's how I read it.

When will the particle refactoring will introduced?
When will the PBR branch will be merged with the main line ?

@ LukasPJ will have to speak for himself on the particle refactor.

For PBR, and speaking strictly for myself, I'm hoping to have all the kinks worked out well enough to make 4.0. (Wouldn't be apropriate for a point-release, since for all that it adds quite a bit, it does take a couple things away and alters folks workflows. May or may not be able to pull out some more extracts to slip in earlier, like that https://github.com/GarageGames/Torque3D/pull/855 that the levelinfo/envVolumes bit augments for fallbacks.)

Let's hope that @ LukasPJ will speak .

You are doing a lot of work and it looks good.

A question for you @ Azaezel : Does T3d need's a ground up rework ?

[Azaezel]

[quote="Chelaru"
A question for you @

Azaezel : Does T3d need's a ground up rework ?[/quote]

Polish, yes. Total rewrite would be a disservice to current users. Not to mention that's that much more playing catchup with other engines.

[Chelaru]

A question for you @ Azaezel : Does T3d need's a ground up rework ?

Polish, yes. Total rewrite would be a disservice to current users. Not to mention that's that much more playing catchup with other engines.

And how much polish is required ?
What functionalities you think need to be polished ?