The current network support for the physics plugins in t3d is very ordinary. If you are planning to use it for anything serious you will need to make changes to the source code.

working? Afaik yes, @JeffR has reported he couldn't get this PR working but after multiple attempts i have never been able to replicate the errors he was getting and it worked ok. If anyone else would like to give it a try that would certainly help. I spent the morning researching, I realized that ...

working?

Afaik yes, @ JeffR has reported he couldn't get this PR working but after multiple attempts i have never been able to replicate the errors he was getting and it worked ok. If anyone else would like to give it a try that would certainly help.

That is an old java project for android, i am not seeing the connection to Torque3D with this?

if there is anyone else that has come across this bug i have submitted a PR for this here

Yes this is d3d11 bug, i will fix this when i get some time over the weekend and submit a PR for it.

I'm always a bit skeptic about magical claims of performance increase, since you would need to actually measure it, to confirm that and most peoples projects are probably not complex enough that they hit the performance limits.

*edit nvm, i'll leave this discussion as it is.

It makes no sense especially because Torque3D already works with DX11 for quite a while now, like over a year or even more. And having DX11 does not give any benefit by itself, so thats also a misconception, DX11 just opens up new technical possibilities and frees up resources so you can improve th...

With all the work to move to new graphics that needs Torque 3D, would have it been a better choice to switch to a ready open source DX11 3D engine like Urho 3D intead or writting a new 3D rendering engine ? https://urho3d.github.io/ This would have been a good choice, and an opportunity for new cha...

Nice work mate, thanks for releasing it under the MIT license.